|
|

Logic of the Model
The model is designed to be used in a number
of ways:
- "generating a forecast" - as a simplified
business planning model which will produce financial projections based
on a limited framework and number of assumptions. It is Intended for
possible use by smaller associations in need of a simple planning model.
- "reconciling a forecast" - to replicate
the financial projections produced by an association's own business
planning model, via a standardised input format, to facilitate a) full
analysis to a standardised format and b) flexing of the forecast. The
standardisation enables the generation of the full range of the model's
financial/graphical/capacity analysis.
From the data input the model exactly replicates the association's own
(unflexed) financial projections via a complex set of "reconciliation
factors". The model can, furthermore, be used to flex key assumptions
and, hence, the financial projections, independent of the association's
own business planning model.
The flexed forecasts will not be as "accurate" as those produced
by the association's own model because the capacity model is built around
a simplified, "one-size-fits-all" logic.
- as a comparative analysis model which can accept
standardised financial projections from housing associations' own business
planning models, together with the set of simplified, standardised assumptions.
It is intended to facilitate comparison of associations with quite diverse
ranges of activities and planning models to a standard format eg for
funding purposes by the Housing Corporation. Projections can also be
flexed to a standard set of assumptions.
- the National Housing Federation and Housing Corporation
may also use the model to produce aggregate data and comparative sector
statistics.
To facilitate the various objectives and uses described above the model
had to be sufficiently detailed to catch many of the key variables which
drive associations' businesses, allowing for the varying mix of business
activities across different associations. But the model had to be much
simpler and less detailed in its structure than associations' own existing,
detailed models to ensure its applicability to all associations while
keeping the input data requirements to a manageable size.

|